Sunday, April 24, 2016

REBUKE: Prince's former drug dealer tells how the legend spent $40,000 at a time on six-month supplies of Dilaudid pills and Fentanyl patches - highly addictive opioid pain killers - for 25 years

I seriously hate lies. Lies infuriate me. My blog used to be about trying to defend Michael Jackson in death. I have already been defending Prince from stupid lies since I was 13, lies about his gender, his "weirdness", his whatever they said about him that was stupid. Now I find myself having to defend him in death and this is something I wish I never had to do. Prince has been a pivotal person in my life for 20 years. A part of me died when he died this past Thursday. I know he was human, I know death was inevitable, but I never imagined it happening with him only being 57 years old. I imagined my kids getting to see him perform someday. I imagined myself getting to see him this year or next year in concert as I had not seen him in about ten years. I imagined him growing old, looking like he did sometimes when he dressed up playing around or be in disguise. I hate that not only has he passed, and passed away alone, but I am literally ripped to see him being smeared by lies that have absolutely NO basis. I wish so badly that is his family would sue the Daily Mirror. I hope they read this and take action against them and sue them for every dime they have and then give it to charities.

Let me address this article first:

Prince's former drug dealer tells how the legend spent $40,000 at a time on six-month supplies of Dilaudid pills and Fentanyl patches - highly addictive opioid pain killers - for 25 years

Before Prince passed, people talked about how he seemed to have found the fountain of youth. I hate to burst the bubble here but someone abusing these drugs, especially for 25 years, would NOT look much younger than their age. There was NEVER any other health scares until this month. If he had stage fright, you would not use pain medications—you would use either a benzodiazepine or possibly a beta blocker. I had the honor of meeting and speaking with Prince and he was NOT on drugs. He was funny, incredibly intelligent, beautiful and HEALTHY. He was very comfortable around people, especially if he trusted them.

This so-called “doctor” is holding up crap from CVS, not Walgreens. Prince going into Walgreens means he had nothing to hide. He may not have even been picking up prescriptions as they sell many other goods (like candy). Walgreens is VERY strict about narcotic sales and limit how much can be ordered, how much can be released, etc. If he had received Percocet or any other medication for pain (or as this loser claims, anxiety), he would have had more than a one- day supply. He had nothing to hide if he was going in there himself. If he was trying to commit illegal drug activities he would NOT keep going to the same store or go in himself!

Any “expert” claiming he likely died of a drug OD—in an ELEVATOR—is an idiot! And sadly most news outlets use idiots as their sources as we have seen time and time before! I am a qualified medical professional and by all means this was likely a natural death, possibly related to complications of the flu. Complications from the flu are still a top ten killer in this country and yes, healthy people are sometimes hit the worst, depending on the strain. Maybe he had a heart condition, maybe lung issues like a clot from flying, maybe he had something wrong health-wise, unrelated to drugs, that caused his untimely passing. You cannot always judge a book by its cover when it comes to heart disease or even cancer.

If he really ODed on Percocet on the plane then they would have to give more than a “safe shot”, the effects of the Tylenol would have to be taken care of, too, with IV medications for some time. If he supposedly had all this "stash", trust me, he would have had Narcan on board. Why didn’t he? Because he was not a drug addict.

Oh and yeah, Percocet wouldn’t destroy the kidneys, it would destroy the liver.

He "smoked" fentanyl? Yet he couldn’t stand being around cigarette smoke?!

He was eating a skinless chicken breast? He was vegetarian.

He didn’t have much of a personality?! ARE YOU KIDDING?! He was FUNNY. He could have done stand up if he hadn’t been a musical genius. And no, it wasn’t from drugs, it was HIM. LIES LIES LIES.

Then there is this, basically another rehash with a few more inaccurate tibits:

Highly addictive and potentially lethal: How Prince's 'overdose drug' Percocet has been linked to string of celebrity fatalities including Michael Jackson and Elvis

Keep in mind, so far, there has been no proof Prince ever took Percocet. Percocet is not much different than another medication called Norco which is actually prescribed to thousands of patients every day for moderate to severe pain. I have a hard time imagining Prince taking narcotics, but even if he did, this does not mean he was an "addict".

Quoting the article:
It is extremely easy to overdose on the drug just by taking more than two Percocet pills at once, especially if the immune system is low, according to Prescription Drugs.org.


I went to this site and this information does not exist. There is NO mention of the immune system having any issue with taking Percocet or any pain medication for that matter. Taking two Percocet tablets would not be issue. Again, the acetaminophen/paracetamol content is the concern due to liver issues if more than 4000 mg a day is taken for multiple days at a time. How pathetic that an article sites a source but completely makes up information. Like people cannot read?

Another beyond erroneous quote from the article:
Indeed Jackson was a regularly took the drug, along with other opioids including Methadone, Fentanyl, Dilaudid and Vicodin. Massive quantities of all the above - including Percocet - were found in his home at the time of his death.


Please see my old blog posts about what was actually found. I have the official court documents listed. There were NO, zip, zilch, nada pain medications found in Michael’s house. He had ZERO pain medications in his system. How can an article get away with these lies when the official court documents indicate it is 100% false??

Wait, did this article really just invent a drug called NORCAL?!

PLEASE PEOPLE. Do not believe the trash! Do not believe the lies! Do not believe the false information! Do not believe the libel before you that is being used for profit! Educate yourself then educate others!

Tuesday, February 2, 2016

THIS IS WHY BERNIE SANDERS HAS MY VOTE

I am voting for Bernie Sanders in the upcoming election for numerous reasons, but I want to highlight some of my reasons here that I feel many people will be able to relate to in some way. Please listen to what I have to say, it will not take too long. It could change your life.

EDUCATION:
First of all, I believe everyone should be entitled to a free or low-cost education. Currently, education is not affordable, even when taking out federal loans. Let me explain something. Here is a graphic that will make sense to many or may make sense soon to those who have yet to graduate:



I had most of my undergraduate education paid for with grants due to academic achievements while in high school. Most of my loan balance is due to obtaining a doctorate degree (not in “grammar” so pardon any mistakes I may make). All of my loans were federal loans, except one small private loan which was paid off shortly after graduation. I have currently chosen to pay back the minimum on my federal student loans that are now consolidated. Why? Take a look at my payment and see how much is applied to the interest versus the principal. A whopping $30 is going towards my principal. I have been paying on my loans since 2012 and rather than my balance going down, it has actually increased by a couple thousand dollars even though I pay $605 every month, on time. I am expected to pay over $245,000 over the next 25-30 years if I stay on this payment path. I have an interest rate of 5.75% (I get a slight deduction for using auto-pay). When I called the federal lender to ask if I could apply extra payment to my principal (to lower the amount of interest being paid) about 18 months ago, I was told that was not allowed on federal loans. I have tried to refinance my loans through private lenders only to be turned down because of the high amount or because they do not offer a better interest rate. Thus, I am stuck, in a sense. I am stuck with a loan that is a burden but should not be one. I am lucky enough to be able to repay my loan, but do not feel it is fair to be stuck with a high interest rate that will not be lowered, to have the massive majority of my payment go towards interest and to not be allowed to apply any extra payment to the principal balance of my loan. It is a trap—by the federal government no less. I want to do the right thing but am blocked from doing so. Why does the government want to put me in a situation to fail at some point in time? I am not the only one.

I believe Bernie can make huge changes for people like me and all of the other students out there facing a loan crisis because they tried to make their lives better by going to school only to fall flat from the loan situation so many of us face today. He wants education to be free—an equal opportunity for all. He wants to end this system of failure that is put in place for so many students across the nation. If you want this changed for you, for your children and for future generations, please vote for Bernie Sanders!

INSURANCE:
I work in a field where I deal with Medicare and Medicaid daily. I know how I view Medicaid may be different than others since it is a state program, but it is likely similar in some states.

Let me start with Medicare first. To have prescription drug coverage, one needs a Medicare Part D (D for drug) plan. That comes with a cost, even if you have been paying into the “system” (taxes) for years. What I witness, usually at the beginning of the year, and somewhere in the middle of the year, is patients being forced to choose. They are forced to choose whether or not to eat tomorrow because their medication is so expensive. They are forced to choose not to pick up their medication because it is too expensive, thus they end up having to go to the hospital and rack up an even higher bill they cannot afford—yet they have insurance. Why so? This is because of deductibles. This is because of “donut holes”. Oh no, these are not the tasty donut holes you get from Krispy Kreme. What happens is people are met with high prices for their drugs because before they can get to their normal co-pays, they must first pay off a deductible which varies from person to person, plan to plan. Some deductibles are applied at once, even if $1000, while some deductibles are split up over time. What you mostly see are our senior citizens who are diabetics being forced to pay up to $400 for their insulin. Insurance may cover $20 of the $600 cost. Insulin is required for a diabetic to survive if their diabetes is Type I or a more serious type of Type II. There is no generic insulin available. You see these patients failing to follow their medication regiments because they simply cannot afford them, even when they have insurance, and even when they have paid their dues over the years working and paying into the system. Without proper blood sugar levels, lowered by insulin, these people end up becoming ill with infections which then leads to losing their limbs, sometimes their eyesight, their livelihood and ultimately their lives. There has to be an end to this! Bernie will end this because he wants deductibles as we know it to END. This would ultimately keep so many people out of the hospital and save millions, if not billions of dollars.

Many patients are also on Medicaid. Medicaid is meant to be a temporary solution for people who are not able to afford insurance either from a lack of a job or other reasons. However, at least in some states, it seems some people are able to abuse this system, while the system also abuses itself. In Texas, Medicaid requires many drugs to be dispensed as “Name Brand Only” when a cheaper, generic alternative exists. Examples include asthma medications (Pulmicort), ADHD medications (Focalin, Intuniv and sometimes Adderall), antibiotics (Suprax), cough syrups (Bromfed DM which has a generic available made by the parent company). Some Medicaid plans demand these medications be name brand yet some plans do not reimburse the pharmacies properly, causing stores like Walmart to stop accepting some Medicaid plans because of a loss of profits.

What I say next may be upsetting to some, but I find it concerning when I see people on Medicaid, which is meant to help those needing help getting on their feet, driving new vehicles. I do not mean a new small affordable car, but rather an expensive new Chevrolet Suburban, Mercedes or a Lexus. I do not know their income, I do not know their job status, but from the outside, it seems unfair that if one can afford such a vehicle that they are entitled to not only free medications, but free and in many instances name brand medications. Many working tax payers who are not covered with insurance, or have high deductibles, are paying for those name brand medications without even knowing it most times for someone who can afford a car that may cost as much as a small home in certain cities in the nation. Call me harsh, but I do not see this as being fair. I want equal and fair coverage for ALL. Bernie does, too.

Yet, there are still thousands, likely millions, of people falling through the cracks from Obamacare. They cannot afford “decent” insurance. What I mean by that is they can obtain insurance at a monthly premium of maybe $100 a month, only to face what I mentioned above happening to the Medicare patients—high deductibles which result in skipping or simply not taking necessary medications. It is cheaper for someone to buy a Walgreens Prescription Savings Club card ($20 a year for an individual or $35 a year for a family, but sadly those on Medicare are not eligible) than to pay for an insurance that is likely to reimburse even less than a discount card. Even free discount cards on the internet are sometime better than insurance.

As Bernie has said—medical care should not be a privilege, it should be a right for all, an equal right for all regardless of income, disability or age. Deductibles need to end. It should be a right to all as if it were a new amendment to the Constitution. Nothing is more frightening than seeing a family member who works hard and pays his or her taxes not be able to afford insurance or skip getting it because it is not worth getting due to deductibles. It is something to lose sleep over every single night worrying about an uninsured loved one. Bernie Sanders will change this if you will vote for him.

Please, I ask you to join me in voting for Bernie Sanders. He wants to help everyone. He wants to make so many things in life not only fair but better, for you and for me and for those before and after us.

VOTE FOR BERNIE!!!

Tuesday, December 29, 2015

What You May Not Know about PETA, the ASPCA and the HSUS

I know many of you may have already sent in donations to some of the major “pet charities” this year for the holidays, hoping it would help save animals. There are three main groups, as I think they should be referred to rather than charities: American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA).

What I want to say is simple: PLEASE DO NOT DONATE TO THESE “CHARITIES”. Instead, I ask you donate to local animal shelters (kill or even no-kill local because those animals need help, too) where you can witness what is occurring, where you can actually take food or bedding and see animals. If you cannot adopt from a no-kill or a kill shelter, then please donate items to animal shelters and rescues or even gift cards. Many cities have local Humane Societies and local SPCAs. These are not the same thing as the large groups that you see advertised on television.

HSUS:
The following is from HSUS Shelter Spending in Your State (please click on the hyperlinks to see the websites shared throughout this article):

As we have previously reported, only about 1% of the budget of the deceptively named Humane Society of the United States goes to local pet shelters, and the organization doesn't operate any shelters of its own. Not that you would learn these facts from HSUS’s ads, which are full of dogs and cats. An examination of HSUS’s 2013 tax return (the most recent available) reveals that although the extreme animal-liberation group took in more than $130 million in revenues, very little went to local pet shelters. How much went to help pet shelters in your state? Take a look at the map below (PDF). The answer may shock you. Of its $130 million in revenues, HSUS gave less than $10,000 to help local pet shelters care for pets in 29 states. Shelters in 11 states – Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Nevada, Rhode Island, Utah, and Wyoming – didn’t receive a single dime from HSUS to help them care for pets. If only 1% of HSUS’s budget goes to local pet shelters, where does the other 99% go? A few examples of wasteful HSUS spending:  In the past two years, HSUS has put $50 million into Caribbean tax shelters instead of pet shelters.  HSUS paid more than $6 million to settle a federal racketeering and bribery lawsuit brought against it and two of its in-house lawyers.  HSUS CEO and President Wayne “I don’t love animals” Pacelle, received more than $400,000 in total compensation while the rest of staff pulled in nearly $44 million more. Instead of funding the lavish lifestyles of HSUS execs who are socking away your donations in off-shore hedge funds, consider donating to pet shelters in your area.


ASPCA:
From Nathan Winograd we learn about Oreo, a dog that was treated for injuries sustained from being thrown out a window, only to be killed for supposedly becoming aggressive, while the money was pocketed from her rescue attempts that were basically blocked. We also learn that the ASPCA has been fundamental in blocking laws that could save up to 25,000 pets a year. The ASPCA is not a “no-kill” organization, either. None of the big three I will be discussing in this article are no-kill, but rather heavy-kill. Sadly, the ASPCA was founded by a wonderful man named Henry Bergh. But greed and power-hunger has taken over in the decades since his founding of the organization. It needs to revert back to what it was meant to be.

When I tried to search for how much money from the ASPCA goes to animals I got this error page. Not sure what the page is supposed to say, perhaps it is supposed to say how much money the ASPCA gets from people conned like myself, but it is private, so who knows. At least tax statements do not typically lie and those are public.

ASPCA and HSUS:
This informative article by Katherine Ainsworth pretty much says it all. Please take the time to read it carefully. I will highlight some key points below.

ASPCA:
The President and CEO of the ASPCA is Matthew Bershadker and he is making more than $566,000 a year. The ASPCA gave just 0.045% of its multi-million dollar donations to local shelters. “In 2009, the ASPCA spent more than 19 million dollars on advertising, a number which has only increased in recent years.” “The ASPCA themselves claims they saved 4,000 dogs last year. Their IRS statement for 2012 shows $226 million dollars in gross receipts. Let’s be generous and say the ASPCA gives half its donations to the animals. That would mean each dog was given $28,250 of care and supplies.” “The ASPCA has been part of a RICO case for quite some time. RICO stands for “Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations”.

HSUS:
Per Wayne Pacell, President of HSUS, “I don’t love animals or think they’re cute.” He does claim to “respect” them but not enough to respect their right to live. The HSUS stance on the Michael Vick animal abuse: “The print ad read: ‘…make a special gift to help the Humane Society of the United States care for the dogs seized in the Michael Vick case… your gift will be put to use right away to care for these dogs.’ And since the dogs were in the public spotlight and clearly needed help, the donations immediately began to pour in, as usual. However, this one rare time, HSUS was called on its crap. The New York Times reported accurately that not only was HSUS not providing any care whatsoever to the Vick dogs but that Wayne Pacelle went on the record saying the dogs should be immediately euthanized. After being caught with their hand in the doggy cookie jar, HSUS was forced to halt all Michael Vicks-related donation requests.”

The HSUS raised over 34 million dollars for the pets of New Orleans. However, only $7 million of that $34 million was spent on New Orleans. The remaining $27 million remains unaccounted for a decade later.

The HSUS operates no shelters.

PETA
PETA has to be the most hypocritical group in existence. I am not a huge fan of the Daily Mail in the UK but these numbers are fairly accurate given they have been duplicated in other articles that are reliable and from government documents correctly sourced. This article by the Daily Mail states that PETA had killed 2,000 pets in 2013, achieving a staggering 82% kill rate for its shelter (or rather slaughterhouse). They have killed 31,000 animals since 1998 (this was in 2014). 'This delusional animal rights group is talking out of both sides of its mouth – on one side preaching animal rights, while on the other signing the death warrant of 82 percent of cats and dogs in its care. Labeling PETA as hypocritical would be the understatement of the year-- Will Coggin from the Center for Consumer Freedom.

'We could become a no-kill shelter immediately. It means we wouldn't do as much work”—Ingrid Newkirk, who also brags about killing hundreds of animals herself, even going into work early to engage in such activities.

“According to VDAS, in 2010 discovered that 84 percent of the animals PETA took in were killed within 24 hours.”

Why PETA Kills and PETA Kills Animals are very informative sites. Nathan Winograd’s website provides a lot of information about PETA. The first link provided (Why PETA Kills) is actually his website as well. One of my browsers tried to say the site may not be safe but I can assure you information from Winograd is safe (I hope PETA is not behind his site saying it may not be safe to view, interesting!).

Someone may be asking why PETA, who is known for boycotting Burger King over meat, would be killing household pets. Simply put, PETA’s founder Ingrid Newkirk believes that animals being pets is basically torture and that they are better off dead than living (sound familiar from above, right?). Animals have a purpose, especially domesticated animals which are first and foremost companion animals. They are meant to be part of our lives. They are meant to be loved. Some are meant to be companions for those with disabilities—diabetes, PTSD, epilepsy, physical challenges, etc. Please educate yourself and do NOT support these groups. PLEASE donate to local organizations you know you can trust and that do truly put the animals first. Please share this article with every animal lover you know. Together we can educate the public and stop these groups from getting millions from those who need it most—the animals. They either need to be eradicated or have new leadership put in place. Hopefully this will also lead to the US becoming a no-kill nation.

Sunday, December 27, 2015

A Few Tips for Dog Owners New and Old

I want to offer some tips I have learned while caring for dogs over the years. I see it too often that people adopt a dog only to return it hours, days or sometimes years later. Once you commit to a dog, it should be a lifetime commitment. I would rather see a dog go back to a shelter than be abused or killed by selfish owners, but so many times dogs are returned over incredibly petty reasons. My mom has a dog that was returned to a kill shelter once or twice for supposedly “digging”. She has never caught her digging out of the yard or even digging holes in the middle of the yard. However, she has destroyed multiple dog crates (kennels). She was not going back to the pound as death would likely be inevitable. She purchased an aluminum crate through Cabela’s for Lily. It is a crate sometimes used for hunting dogs as it can be attached to the bed of a pickup. Lily is no bird dog but she has learned to love her crate. She sleeps in it at night and stays in it while her mom is at work. Below is a photo of what it looks like:
Sadly, I do not think Cabela’s still carries these crates but if you go to smile.amazon.com (using Amazon Smile means you can donate part of your purchase to your favorite local animals shelters) and search for “aluminum dog crates” you can find her crate (it is pricey at over $600 for an extra-large crate) but there are some similar aluminum crates that would likely offer the same ability and stability as aluminum is much more durable than any of the steel wire crates. Another idea I learned from attending adoption events is using a small metal pail along with what is called a “double bolt snap” for a water source. The double bolt snap can typically be found in a farm store in the horse department. Below is a photo of this set up that helps provide water while taking up minimal space and preventing spillage:
Finally, thanks to a worker at Home Depot, I learned how to keep one of my boys from digging up under the fence and through the wooden planks. Below is a photo of the steel lath that prevents dogs from digging. It can be found in the lumber department at Home Depot and is about $7 dollars per sheet. A sheet is about 2 feet by 8 feet. You can trim to fit. You can place it on the ground and then cover with dirt to camouflage it from view. I also placed cement cinder blocks on top of the mesh since my boy is so strong and I figured he may try to pull it from up under the fence. I also lined the wood in the fence with it since he will scratch the fence when he sees bikes, cats and other dogs. It keeps him protected as well as anything outside the fence. He is a sweet dog but easily stimulated by things outside of his yard area. To connect the mesh to the fence, I used “U” shaped nails. I also reinforced it with staples via staple gun. The mesh works because it hurts their paws but it has not caused their feet any cuts or other injuries. However, it will cause your hands damage if you handle the edges so use gloves when handling it and keep it away from younger children. Here is a link to the steel lath: http://www.homedepot.com/p/Unbranded-27-in-x-8-ft-Steel-Lath-2-5-METAL-LATH/202093395 Below is a photo of one sheets:
I hope some of these tips will help people to keep pets they are thinking about rehoming or taking to a shelter due to digging, crate issues, etc. I also hope it will help keep pets safe and hydrated if they are crated. If you know of any other novel ideals please feel free to share them with this blog.

Friday, December 11, 2015

For Kip...

This posting is for Kip and the numerous dogs out there that are alive and like Kip and for those now gone forever yet still like Kip. Kip was a precious 4 month old puppy in the Arlington, Texas pound. I do not think the facility is worthy of being called a shelter. For several weeks people shared him and pledged for his rescue. He was not available for adoption to the public due to two non-life threatening conditions: demodex mange and entropion. Demodex mange is a non-contagious skin condition that is caused by mites when a dog’s immune system cannot keep the mites at bay. Entropion is an eyelid condition that typically requires surgery that over time can scratch the eye and cause blindness. Both were easy conditions (mange costs about $30 to treat giving daily medication for about a month) that most adopters could take care of themselves cost-wise; however because of these conditions, this dog was deemed unadoptable by the pound vet. He became what is called “rescue only”. This is usually a death sentence even for the sweetest of dogs. Rescues are already overflowing due to so many pounds, calling themselves shelters, killing sometimes as many as 9 out of 10 dogs. However, Kip had a rescue begging for him. He had people pledging money for his rescue. The rescue was located in Virginia, and was not a 501c3 (non-profit registered with the government/can take years to achieve). On behalf of the rescue, Sheila R. tried desperately to rescue this precious baby. She and myself emailed back and forth with them only to basically be given a runaround. Transport and medical care would have been taken care of 100%. But, instead of this pound working with Sheila and the rescue in Virginia, she was told the only rescues allowed to pull this dog were ones that were local, “approved” by the pound AND had to be 501c3—but the real kicker was that the pound refused to give names of rescues, too! The pound would also not allow an approved rescue to pull for the Virginia rescue to take over. Sheila and many others tried in vain to get a local rescue to pull this puppy, making calls and emailing, so that her rescue in turn could get him up to Virginia to get the medical care he needed. After trying for 20 days, Kip was murdered. He did not have to be murdered. He had people who wanted to take care of him and love him. The Arlington, Texas pound made it basically impossible to save this dog; they seemingly got the result they so desired which was for him to be killed. This kind of nonsense needs to stop. Pounds need to stop making it virtually impossible to get animals out and on top of that giving them a short time frame. They need to stop refusing rescues. The Harvey Act in California needs to be nation-wide. It is not that hard to do a reference check on a rescue to see if they are legitimate. Most people want to give animals a good home. For those who do not, who choose to fight animals and abuse animals, we need national and/or state databases just as we do for sex offenders. That would make things so much easier and save lives. We need EVERY life saved. Here is my start, by sharing Kip's story.
PS If anyone would like to view copies of the emails please let me know and I will post them.

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Discrepancies of the IV Stand

***Please note due to some personal issues my blog went on hiatus for some time--then I began a new job. Thus, I was not able to view all testimony from the trial or keep abreast with everything that has followed since the trial. I am waaaay behind. At some point I will go back and view expert testimony I missed as I will also view Conrad Murray's so-called documentary. In the meantime, I wanted to get this piece up that I began working in on October. There may be some information left out or "old"--but it can always be added in over a period of time and at least this portion will be a good start, I hope.***

One night it occurred to me that something is very wrong with the set-up of the IV found in the bedroom at Michael's home. For starters, it was moved at some point in time. Besides that, other things do not add up when one looks at this IV stand and what was connected to it at various times. This issue ties somewhat into the issue of was there a gravity-fed propofol drip or not (which will be covered later). I think the best way to describe the inconsistencies is to use verbatim witness testimony from January, not October, with accompanying photos from the trial. I know there may be some changes in what these witnesses said in the trial but I will cover any differences later when those transcripts are available. The main objective of this blog is just to visually see the changes that occurred with this IV and see there is inconsistency.


The following testimony is from Alberto Alvarez:

When Alvarez made it to the second story of the home he states of Murray:

Alvarez: I SAW DOCTOR MURRAY COMING FROM LIKE A HALLWAY, AND HE WAS WALKING IN TOWARDS THE ROOM, SIR.

He states Murray was in the "Landing Area" and walking towards the "Foyer Area". Alvarez states Murray was "walking"--not running--towards the room.

Click on the photos to enlarge them.



Alberto states the only equipment he saw was an IV stand and oxygen tank. He states it was located on the far side of the bed, by the nightstand and the chairs.

Walgren: OKAY. AND COULD YOU TELL AT THAT TIME WHETHER THE I.V. STAND HAD ANYTHING ATTACHED TO IT AND THEN ATTACHED TO MICHAEL JACKSON?

Alvarez: WELL, I DIDN'T LOOK. I JUST -- I NOTICED IT WAS THERE. I DIDN'T FOCUS ON IT UNTIL I WAS GIVEN, I WAS TOLD TO GRAB SOMETHING FROM THERE.

Alvarez states Murray removed vials from the nightstand and placed them in a clear bag that Alvarez grabbed, located in or by a chair. Alvarez states at this time Murray was kneeling, not standing. Alvarez was at the foot of the bed. Alvarez was then instructed to place the clear bag with vials into a brown bag that was to the left of a chair that was facing the bed, right at the bottom. Alvarez states there was a blue bag next to the brown bag.

Walgren: NOW IN REGARD TO THE I.V. BAG REMOVAL, CAN YOU DESCRIBE WHAT DOCTOR MURRAY SAID AND DID IN INSTRUCTING YOU TO REMOVE THE I.V. BAG FROM THE I.V. STAND?

Alvarez: YES, FROM HIS POSITION, HE POINTED WITH ONE HAND TO THE I.V. STAND AND HE SAID, "REMOVE THAT, REMOVE THAT BAG AND PUT IT IN THE BLUE BAG."

Walgren: AND DID YOU NOTICE ANYTHING ABOUT THAT I.V. BAG THAT CAUGHT YOUR ATTENTION WHEN YOU REMOVED IT?

Alvarez: YES, SIR. THE I.V. BAG WAS HANGING MORE OF EYE LEVEL AND SO AS I AM REACHING TO DISCONNECT IT FROM THE TOP OR UNHANG IT, I NOTICED AT THE -- AND INSIDE, THERE WAS LIKE A BOTTLE INSIDE THE BAG. AND I JUST -- I NOTICED THAT AND THEN I NOTICED THAT AT THE BOTTOM OF THE BAG, THERE WAS LIKE A MILK-LIKE SUBSTANCE, SIR.

Walgren: OKAY. SEPARATE FROM THE BOTTLE, YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT A LIQUID?

Alvarez: YES. IT WAS AT THE TIP OR AT THE BOTTOM OF THE BAG, SIR.
Walgren: AND WHEN YOU SAY "MILK-LIKE," DO YOU MEAN COLOR? CONSISTENCY?

Alvarez: IT LOOKED LIKE MILK.



Walgren: AND WHEN YOU REMOVED THAT I.V. BAG, IT APPEARED TO HAVE A BOTTLE INSIDE OF IT. WAS THERE STILL ANOTHER I.V. BAG HANGING FROM THE I.V. STAND?

Alvarez confirms there was another bag.

Walgren: OKAY. DID DOCTOR MURRAY EVER INSTRUCT YOU TO REMOVE THAT BAG?

Alvarez: NO, SIR.

Walgren: OKAY. ONCE THE 911 CALL WAS CONCLUDED AND THE 911 OPERATOR HAD ADVISED YOU TO GET MICHAEL JACKSON TO THE FLOOR, WHAT DID YOU DO?

Alvarez: I WENT AND, I BELIEVE, I SAID WE GET HIM TO THE FLOOR. AND THEN I GRABBED, I GRABBED MR. JACKSON'S LEGS. BUT AT THAT TIME, I DIDN'T KNOW HOW TO GRAB BECAUSE THERE WAS AN I.V. STUCK IN HIS LEG AND DOCTOR MURRAY PROCEEDED TO TAKE IT OFF WHEN HE SAW THAT I WAS HESITATING AND SO I GRABBED HIS LEGS, AND HE GRABBED THE UPPER PART OF HIS BODY. AND BY -- WHILE HE WAS REACHING FOR THAT, HE ALSO PUT THIS APPARATUS IN HIS FINGER. AND THEN WE PROCEEDED TO BRING HIM DOWN TO THE FLOOR.

This apparatus was a pulse-oximeter. Alvarez had not seen it placed on Michael before but had seen the device a few days prior as Murray asked for batteries for it.

Chernoff: IT (the IV) WAS STILL CONNECTED TO MICHAEL JACKSON WHEN YOU MOVED HIM?

Alvarez: PRIOR TO US MOVING HIM, MR. CONRAD MURRAY REMOVED THE I.V.

(You will later see this statement by Alvarez clashes with that of Richard Senneff.)

Chernoff: OKAY. SO, AND THIS WAS JUST RIGHT BEFORE YOU MOVED HIM DOWN TO THE FLOOR?

Alvarez: YES, SIR.

Chernoff: AND I ASSUME THAT YOU HAD TO MOVE THE I.V. STAND AS WELL SINCE IT WAS RIGHT THERE IN THE WAY OF WHERE YOU WERE PLACING MICHAEL JACKSON?

Alvarez: I DON'T RECALL, SIR, BECAUSE IT WAS A LONG, PRETTY LONG TUBE, CLEAR TUBE THAT WAS CONNECTED TO THAT I.V. SO THE I.V. WASN'T IN THE WAY. WE JUST BROUGHT HIM DOWN RIGHT BESIDE THE BED, SIR.

Chernoff: NOW THIS I.V. BAG THAT YOU TOOK OFF THE STAND, THE I.V. STAND, IT WASN'T SUCH -- WAS IT A SITUATION WHERE YOU COULD JUST QUICKLY REMOVE THE I.V. BAG? OR WAS IT SITUATED WHERE YOU HAVE TO, KIND OF HAVE TO TURN IT AROUND TO CURLY Q. IT ON?

Alvarez: THAT IS CORRECT. I HAD TO CURL IT AROUND BECAUSE IT WAS A LITTLE HOOK LIKE THAT. SO.

Chernoff: SO YOU CERTAINLY HAD A PERIOD OF TIME WHERE YOU WERE HOLDING THAT I.V. BAG, CORRECT?

Alvarez agrees.

Chernoff asks if it had any fluid in it.

Alvarez: VERY LITTLE FLUID AT THE BOTTOM. AND THE ONLY REASON I NOTICED IT WAS BECAUSE IT WAS UP TO MY EYE LEVEL. I NOTICED AT THE BOTTOM OF IT, THERE WAS THAT MILKY WHITE SUBSTANCE, SIR.

Chernoff: WE ARE GOING TO GET TO THAT, BUT WAS THE ONLY FLUID THAT SMALL AMOUNT OF FLUID THAT WAS GOING INTO THE CONNECTOR?

Alvarez agrees.

Chernoff: WHERE WAS THAT BOTTLE THAT YOU SAW INSIDE THE I.V. BAG?

Alvarez: IT WAS TOWARDS THE BOTTOM OF THE BAG, SIR.

Chernoff: AND YOU ARE SURE TODAY IT WAS INSIDE THAT I.V. BAG, RIGHT?

Alvarez: TO MY BEST OF MY RECOLLECTION, YES.

Chernoff: THE I.V. BAG THAT YOU SAY WAS LEFT ON IT, ON THE STAND WAS THE ONE THAT WAS CONNECTED TO MICHAEL JACKSON? YOU REMEMBER THAT?

Alvarez: YES, SIR.

Chernoff: OKAY. THE ONE THAT YOU TOOK OFF FROM THE I.V. STAND WAS NOT CONNECTED TO ANYBODY OR ANYTHING?

Alvarez: NO, SIR.

Chernoff asks if it was just hanging there and Alvarez states this is correct.

Alvarez did note that he recalled seeing an ambu-bag (he referred to it as a breathing apparatus and said it was on the floor). Though there are no photos of the vial in the bag as it was seen by Alvarez or Fleak, Fleak did retrieve this vial from the cut bag. Alvarez stated the propofol was secured in the IV bag and slightly diagonal. This could have contributed to some of the propofol in the corner of the bag though some appears to be on the outside of the bag as well.



See here for some additional photos regarding Alvarez.


Now, we move onto paramedic Richard Senneff and his testimony about the IV set-up:

Walgren: DID YOU SEE AN I.V. STAND OR I.V. KIT?

Senneff confirms he did.

Walgren asks where the IV was located.

Senneff: THAT WAS ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE BED BETWEEN THE DOCTOR AND ME, YEAH.

Notice that Senneff states the IV pole was located on the same side of the bed as the nightstands, or the left/far side of the bed.

Walgren: NOW, LET'S TALK ABOUT THE I.V. STAND. YOU SAW THE I.V. AT LEAST WHEN YOU ARRIVED, THE I.V. WAS HOOKED UP TO THE PATIENT?

Senneff agrees.

Walgren: DO YOU RECALL WHERE IT WAS HOOKED UP TO?

Senneff: I BELIEVE IT WAS HIS LEFT LEG ON THE CALF, ON THE INSIDE OF HIS LEFT CALF.

Walgren: DID THAT APPEAR TO BE HOOKED UP TO A STANDARD SALINE BAG OR I.V. BAG?

Senneff: YES, IT DID. I DIDN'T EXAMINE THE BAG, BUT AT A DISTANCE IT APPEARED TO BE A STANDARD SALINE BAG.

Now, Alvarez stated that Murray removed the IV when they moved Michael to the floor. Given the IV catheter was still in place, it seems Murray disconnected the IV tubing from the bag to the catheter only, not the catheter itself (at least, not at that point in time). At some point then, it seems Murray reconnected the IV tubing though there is an overlapping of when Michael was being moved to the floor by Murray and Alvarez and when paramedics arrived in the bedroom. Murray would have had to have reconnected the IV fairly quickly.

Walgren: WHEN YOU GAVE THE FIRST ROUND OF EPINEPHRINE AND ATROPINE, WAS THAT ADMINISTERED VIA THAT I.V. THAT HAD ALREADY BEEN IN PLACE OR A NEW I.V.?

Senneff agrees it was already in place.

Walgren: WAS THERE SOME TYPE OF, I GUESS, RESTRUCTURING OF THE I.V. PORT THAT NEEDED TO BE DONE TO MAKE YOUR EQUIPMENT COMPATIBLE WITH THAT I.V.?

Senneff agrees and Walgren asks for a explanation.

Senneff: THERE IS TWO SYSTEMS FOR ADMINISTERING MEDICATIONS THROUGH I.V.'S. IT IS WITH A NEEDLE AND WITHOUT A NEEDLE, COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS NEEDLE-LESS. IN THE PRE-HOSPITAL CARE SETTING, WE CHANGED OVER TO A NEEDLE-LESS SYSTEM YEARS AGO BECAUSE IT IS JUST TOO EASY TO STICK YOURSELF WITH A CONTAMINATED NEEDLE WHEN YOU ARE DRIVING DOWN THE STREET IN THE BACK OF AN AMBULANCE. THE DIFFERENCE IS YOU HAVE THE I.V. CATHETER, THE TUBE THAT IS ACTUALLY IN THE VEIN. IT HAS A LITTLE HUB ON IT, THEN THE PORT THAT GOES INTO IT. THAT IS THE DIFFERENCE IS THE TYPE OF PORT. A NEEDLE PORT HAS LIKE A LITTLE RUBBER STOPPER ON THAT YOU PUT THE NEEDLE IN THE CENTER. A NEEDLE-LESS HAS A VALVE INSIDE. YOU SCREW THE NEEDLE-LESS SYRINGE ONTO IT, AND THEN THAT RELEASES A VALVE AND YOU PUSH THE SOLUTION IN THEN YOU UNSCREW IT TO REMOVE IT. WITH A NEEDLE, YOU SLIDE THE NEEDLE IN, INJECT SOLUTION, AND SLIDE THE NEEDLE BACK OUT.

Walgren: JUST TO BE REAL SIMPLE HERE, WHEN YOU GET THERE, THERE IS AN I.V. BAG HANGING FROM THE I.V. STAND?

Senneff agrees.

Walgren: A TUBE IS COMING FROM THAT BAG, AND IT IS ATTACHED TO MICHAEL JACKSON'S LEG AREA?

Senneff agrees.

Senneff states the bag was connected to Michael but as will be pointed out after all testimony is covered, the bag found at the scene may not have had tubing attached to it.

Walgren: THEN OFF OF THAT TUBE AT SOME LOCATION IS A PORT ALLOWING FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF DRUGS INTO THAT I.V. TUBING?

Senneff agrees. Senneff states it was a needle system kit when he arrived.

Walgren: SO WHAT WAS CHANGED TO ALLOW YOUR SYRINGES TO SCREW IN, TO BE ACCESSED VIA THE PORT THAT ALREADY EXISTED?

Senneff: WE REMOVED THE SALINE LOCK ITSELF OF THE PORT SYSTEM. JUST CHANGE IT OUT. LEFT THE HUB IN AND PUT A NEW ONE IN.

Walgren: WHILE LEAVING THE EXISTING TUBE, I.V. BAG?

Senneff agrees.

Walgren: JUST CHANGED OUT THE PORT?

Senneff: YES. THE PORT IS WHERE WE ARE GOING TO BE INJECTING OUR MEDICATIONS.

Senneff is asked how many rounds of epinephrine and atropine he gave in the IV catheter in the leg. He states two rounds of each medication.

Walgren: AT SOME POINT THEN AFTER THESE TWO ROUNDS, DID THE LEG I.V. -- WAS IT COMPROMISED IN SOME WAY?

Senneff agrees.

Walgren: DID YOU SEE HOW THAT HAPPENED?

Senneff states he did. Walgren asks what happened.

Senneff: WE HAD OUR MEDICAL KIT OPEN. WE REFER TO IT AS A STARTER KIT. IT HAD THE MEDICATIONS THERE, THE COMMON CARDIAC MEDICINE THAT EVERYBODY IS FAMILIAR WITH IN THE BUSINESS. DR. MURRAY TOOK SOME OF OUR -- TOOK SOME OF THE MEDICINE, AND HE USED THE I.V. PORT AND INJECTED INTO THAT. BUT HE IS USED TO A --

Walgren tells him not to speculate what Murray is used to and asks him what he saw. It seems Senneff was going to speculate Murray was accustomed to a needle-based system only rather than a needleless one.

Senneff: IN USING IT, HE PULLED IT OUT. HE PULLED THE I.V. OUT.

After Michael was transported downstairs, Senneff went back upstairs to retrieve equipment.

Walgren: WHEN YOU WENT BACK UP THE STAIRS TO CHECK ON YOUR EQUIPMENT, DID YOU SEE DR. MURRAY UP IN THE ROOM?

Senneff states he did. Senneff is asked what, if anything, was he doing.

Senneff: HE WAS STANDING AGAIN ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE BED HERE BY THE NIGHTSTAND AND HE HAD A BAG. I WANT TO SAY WHITE, LIKE A PLASTIC TRASH BAG TYPE THING. HE WAS STRAIGHTENING UP, PICKING THINGS UP.

Senneff did not say what Murray was picking up as he was not focusing on him that intensely.

Low (former attorney): AS YOU ARE LOOKING AT THAT SCENE, WERE YOU ABLE TO SEE IF THERE IS ANY MEDICAL LOOKING EQUIPMENT ANYWHERE AROUND?

Senneff states he saw the IV pole with the saline bag.

Low: WHERE, IN RELATION TO THE PERSON IN THE ROOM, IS WHERE THAT I.V. BAG IS?

Senneff: IT IS ADJACENT TO THE BED, APPROXIMATELY WHERE THE PATIENT'S KNEES ARE.

Low: ARE YOU ABLE TO APPROXIMATE DISTANCE INSIDE THE BEDROOM OR FROM THE PATIENT?

Senneff states it was within a foot.

Again, Senneff locates the IV was by the bed.


Paramedic Blount also gave his account of what he saw regarding the IV set-up"

Blount: HE SAID THAT THE REASON WHY THE PATIENT HAD THE I.V. BAG ATTACHED TO HIS LEG WAS BECAUSE HE REHEARSALED THE NIGHT BEFORE. HE WAS EXHAUSTED.

Blount also confirms an IV was attached to Michael as well.

Blount: IT WAS, I THINK IT WAS A HYPODERMIC NEEDLE HE CAME OUT WITH, AND IT WAS LIKE A BLUE COLOR. AND HE SAID, "YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO USE THIS HERE." AND I THINK WE ALL SAID, NO, THAT IS OKAY.

This remark by Blount is a bit odd to me given it seems Murray had items, such as needles, directly on him, such as his pockets.


Michael was taken to the hospital. Coroner investigator Elissa Fleak went to the house that evening and spent about 80 minutes collecting evidence, mostly looking for "pills" as she stated. She did see the IV stand but did not pay any special attention to it at that time. It was not until June 29th, 4 days later, that the IV pole and what it contained was on it was inventoried.

Fleak: THE STAND IS THE METAL POLE WITH THE HOOK AT THE TOP. SALINE BAG IS HERE. THERE IS TUBING DOWN TO THIS AREA WHERE THERE IS A FORK OR A CLAMP IN THE TUBING WHICH HAS A SYRINGE IN IT THEN TUBING CONTINUES DOWN AND IS CLOSED.

Fleak states she entered the IV bag and IV kit into evidence on June 29th, 2009.

She states there was liquid in the IV bag.

Flanagan: AND THIS I.V. BAG HAD SOME TUBING COMING DOWN FROM IT?

Fleak agrees. However, photographs seen below would question her agreement to this statement:



Flanagan: IN THAT TUBING, THERE WAS A SYRINGE?

Fleak: HALFWAY DOWN THE TUBING, THERE WAS A CLAMP, A V-SHAPED CLAMP AND IN ONE OF THE HEADS OF THE CLAMP THERE WAS A SYRINGE. IT WAS NOT DIRECTLY IN THE TUBING.

Fleak is the first person to mention a syringe connected to the IV tubing, in any form. Recall Senneff stated that some portion of the tubing also had the valve changed from one that required a needle to one that did not. The syringe was connected to the tubing via the Y port built into the tubing using a needle. We know this syringe contained flumazenil, propofol and lidocaine as did the distal, short end of the tubing.





Fleak states she cannot recall if the tubing below the Y port had liquid in it but did recall clear liquid in the tubing above the Y port. She also states the bag was clear--no white substance. She states the IV bag appeared to be 3/4 full, 1/2 to 3/4 full when hanging.

Walgren: DID YOU ALSO RECOVER -- EXCUSE ME -- WAS THERE ALSO AN I.V. STAND WITH AN I.V. KIT ATTACHED TO IT AT THE SCENE?

Fleak: YES, THAT WAS IN THE ROOM. IF YOU ARE FACING THE BED, AT THE FOOT OF THE BED IT WAS TO THE RIGHT, TO YOUR RIGHT.

Walgren: IF YOU ARE AT THE FOOT OF THE BED LOOKING TOWARD THE HEAD OF THE BED, IT WOULD BE TO YOUR RIGHT?

Fleak: TO YOUR RIGHT.

Now we see at some point the IV stand was relocated. See the photo below to get a general idea of where the IV was at one point versus where it was later moved.









The golden curtains with the photo of a child in the chair is situated directly across from the bed. If you were lying in the bed, and lifted up, that is what you would see. If you looked to the left, that is where the IV pole had been moved, close to a set of drawers with photos. The chairs were between the bed and the closet/bathroom.

Criminalist Jaime Lintemoot examined the IV equipment and provided a diagram show below:



Walgren: BUT THIS IS A BASIC DIAGRAM OF THE I.V. KIT, INCLUDING THE I.V. BAG, AS WELL AS THE ACCOMPANYING I.V. PLUG, TUBING, THUMB CLAMP, WHITE CLAMP, A Y-FORK, AS WELL AS THE SYRINGE, AND THE SHORT TUBING?

Lintemoot agrees.

Walgren: LET'S JUST BEGIN THEN WITH ITEM "A" SHOWN IN THE TOP LEFT PORTION OF YOUR DIAGRAM. WHAT IS THAT?

She states item A is a diagram of the IV bag. She states it was not attached to the rest of the system at the time she received it for analysis. The particular bag used by Murray came from a company called Hospira. I called Hospira to ask if once a bag was spiked, would it leak once the spike was removed. Hospira confirmed that it would leak all contents once the spike was removed from the bag. Thus, it seems this bag seen by the paramedics, Fleak and Lintemoot was never spiked with IV tubing. Rather, the bag with the propofol bottle enclosed had been spiked and used for saline administration sometime prior to Michael's death, as well as prior to being slit and having a bottle placed in it. Recall that no propofol was found in the long tubing--only the short tubing which also had a syringe hanging out of it when found by Fleak. There was no mention of a syringe by Alvarez, Senneff or Blount.







Walgren: ON YOUR DIAGRAM THEN IN THE LOWER LEFT CORNER, THERE IS A LEGEND INDICATING WHICH ITEMS OR WHICH LABELS APPLY TO WHICH ITEMS?

Lintemoot agrees.

Lintemoot agrees to Walgren's reading of the the key or legend to her diagram. "B" is the syringe--consisting of barrel, plunger and needle. "C" is the "Y" connector. Lintemoot states she does not know if it was plastic or not.

Walgren asks for Lintemoot to describe the syringe and "Y" connector.

Lintemoot: IT WAS A "Y" CONNECTION PIECE. THE SYRINGE WAS GOING INTO ONE END, A PIECE OF SHORT TUBING COMING OUT THE OTHER END, AND A PIECE OF LONG TUBING GOING INTO THE THIRD END.

Lintemoot agrees that "D" is the short tubing that lies below the "Y" connection.

Walgren: AND THE SHORT TUBING THEN PROCEEDS TO "E," WHICH YOU LABEL AS CLEAR TIP. WHAT IS THAT?

Lintemoot: IT WAS A CLEAR TIP THAT HAD A LITTLE BIT OF RED FLUID OR RED STAINING ON THE END OF IT.



Lintemoot confirms "F" is the long tubing.

Walgren: WITH THE "Y" PORT OR THE "Y" CONNECTOR, YOU HAVE A SHORT TUBE COMING OUT OF THE BOTTOM, THE SYRINGE GOING IN THROUGH THE TOP, THEN YOU ALSO HAVE THE LONG TUBING COMING OUT THE THIRD AND FINAL PORT; IS THAT RIGHT?

Lintemoot agrees.

Lintemoot states "G" is a white clamp attached to the tubing and "H" is a white thumb clamp.

Lintemoot states "I" is an "IV bag plug" and describes it:

Lintemoot: IT WAS A CYLINDRICAL PIECE THAT THE LONG TUBING WAS ATTACHED TO WITH A SPIKE ON THE END. TYPICALLY, IT GOES INTO THE I.V. BAG.

It seems Lintemoot is actually referring to the spike and drip chamber as an IV bag plug which is something else which will be covered here shortly.

Lintemoote then covered the following:

Propofol and lidocaine were contained in 0.19 g (approx. 0.2 mL) of fluid from the syringe on the nightstand.

Propofol, lidocaine and flumazenil were contained in 0.17 g (approx. 0.2 mL) of fluid from the syringe connected via needle to the "Y" connection.

Propofol, lidocaine and flumazenil were contained in 0.47 g (approx. 0.5 mL) of fluid from the short IV tubing.

No medications were detected in 17 g (or about 20 mL) from the long IV tubing or 0.38 g (about 0.4 mL) of fluid from the saline bag.


Given the descriptions above along with the photos provided--the IV found in the bedroom at Carolwood was altered at some time by someone. Was it altered by Murray as Michael was being taken downstairs by paramedics? Was it altered by someone other than Murray? I am not sure. I can say that with the syringe being placed in the tubing as it were--it almost seems as if that was planted there as a distraction. Now, this would go against Murray wanting anyone to know he had ordered propofol, but propofol in the IV does not mean that Murray ordered, either. It could, however, have been a useful way to try and say Michael self-injected something. After all, Murray initially tried to claim Michael had his own supply of propofol which is a lie. I already covered in a previous blog the evidence excludes the possibility of Michael self-injecting anything on June 25th.

I know the experts during the trial (Drs. Shafer and White) battled it out over whether or not there was a drip utilized. However, this syringe found would seem to indicate that boluses, either with a drip or without one, were used. Why this was not highlighted clearly, I am not sure. Perhaps it is because boluses would place a person there witnessing any arrest whereas a drip would not (hence, the "involuntary" charge). At some point soon I hope to cover everything the experts said as I think both men should be given credit for their years of study though that does not mean everything stated by them is necessarily fact. With Murray being the only one who knows the truth--all anyone can do is try to guess at what he did to the victim, the victim being Michael in this case. I hope Murray thinks about releasing some details after his stint in jail--even if it is pointing the finger at others (besides Michael), maybe a portion of it will be true given he will be angry after some time that he is the only one who had to be "punished".

Sunday, October 16, 2011

Seacoast Medical Orders by Conrad Murray

This will be another blog in progress, which means it will be updated over time as more information become available as we only have bits and pieces as it stands right now.

I thought it would be a good idea to post up photos of some of the items we know Murray ordered (or attempted to order as some items were on back-order and cancelled) and how they may or may not have pertained to Michael's death--or to just give everyone a general idea of what they may be in this case. This information here will play a part in my next blog where I will be discussing the IV found in the bedroom.

For this blog, I will be covering the items Murray ordered from Seacoast Medical.

Below are copies of *some* of the orders from Seacoast from the trial. Some may be duplicated and some may be missing as well; information regarding dates that is currently known or thought to be known will be provided at the end of this blog:



























For some of the items that are not easily understood, I will briefly explain what they are and provide a photo if available. I was able to trace back to the manufacturer what was exactly what through Seacoast's online product inventory--if you have any questions of how I was able to do this for verification purposes as I do not mind my work being checked, please ask:

#101143 Sodium Chloride Bacteriostatic 0.9%, 30 mL, 25 vials
--this is normal saline (0.9% NaCL or salt), "bacteriostatic" means it contains preservatives and can be used multiple times vs. using a vial only once, this could be used to dilute medications, like IV lorazepam

#002366 Welch Allyn Cuff, etc. and #002672 Aneroid Access
--these are both components to a basic blood pressure cuff, with accessories

#105777 Medex Injection Adapater, etc.
--photo provided below; this adapter is an IV tubing extension--it would connect via Luer Lock and provide for administration via a syringe and needle into IV tubing



#106091 Medex T Connector, etc.
--photos provided below; this is an IV extension kit that has a syringe w/ needle valve (the top port) and a Luer Lock connection as well (bottom port, this would connect to an IV catheter, for example); Murray had one of these, unused, in one of the bags he placed in the closet





#309578 BD 20 G X 1" 3CC Syringe/Needle
--these are 3 mL syringes that come with a 1 inch, 20 gauge needle

#011281 Medex Jelco IV Catheters Radiopaque 24G X 3/4"
--these are IV catheters that are inserted into a vein to administers medications and IV fluids; the larger the gauge of a needle, the smaller the needle actually is (inversely related)

#???483 Syringe 10CC Luer Lock Needle 22G X 1"
--these are 10 mL syringes, with Luer Lock (twist on rather than push or snap on) needles attached, 22 gauge, 1 inch long

#???068 3G Latex Free Glove, Large

#007774 Exel IV Administration Sets, 15 drops/mL, 50 per case
--this is the IV tubing featured below and what was found in the bedroom









#013452 QMS Exam Table Paper
--this sounds like office supplies to me--odd to be ordering it when a doctor is rarely present and his office is ran by non-medical staff

#106176 Avalon Exam Cape Disposable
--appears to be more office supplies

#105884 QMS Exam Gloves Vinyl, Medium

#105883 QMS Exam Gloves Vinyl, Small

#105841 Dukal Alcohol Prep Pads
--these are like the alcohol pads used before you insert a needle into the body

#009737 Starline Gauze Sponge 4" X 4"

#011611 2-Ply Fanfold Drape Sheet
--again, appears to be more office supplies

#798302 Sodium Chloride (IV) 0.9%, 250 mL bag, 48 bags ordered
--these are 250 mL normal saline bags

#798309 Sodium Chloride (IV) 0.9% 1000 mL bag, 24 bags ordered
--these are 1 liter saline bags; apparently Murray ordered some bags from Seacoast and some from Applied Pharmacy Services as well

#007827 Exel Luer Lock Syringes, 10 CC, 100 per box
--these are 10 mL syringes, using Luer Lock, but did not come with accompanying needles

#103483 Syringe 10 CC Luer Lock Needle, 22G X 1", 100 per box
--these apparently go to the syringes mentioned directly above, 22 gauge, 1 inch long

#007853 Exel Hypodermic Needles, 18G X 1 1/2", 100 per box
--these are additional needles, not sure if they are Luer Lock or not, 18 gauge, 1 1/2 inches long

#????85 QMS Exam Gloves Vinyl, Large

#102902 Blood Pressure Device, Child
--this is a child's blood pressure cuff; adult cuffs were ordered as well

#103293 3M Transpore, 12 per box, 1" X 10 yards
--this is basic medical tape

#103653 Tourniquets, Latex Free, 10 per bag

#011287 Medex Jelco IV Catheters, Radiopaque 22G X 1", 50 per box
--these are IV catheters that are inserted into a vein to administers medications and IV fluids, these are slightly larger than the 24 G (22 G are blue, 24 G are yellow)





#103747 Starline Prem. Blood Pressure Unit, Black, Latex-Free Adult
--this may be the one that was located in the bedroom, apparently unopened and unused

#??5914 Kendall Tendersorb Underpads
--these are the "chux" pads or padding that was on the bed, for incontinence

#??6613 External Catheter--Medium (Condom Catheter) and #004241 Tegaderm Transparent Dressing, 2 3/8 inch X 2 3/4 inch
--photo provided below (these would not be used together, to save time I included them together in the photo; the Tegaderm dressing could be used to help keep IV catheters in place



#??6653 External Catheter, Small, 30 per box

#??4839 Leg Bags for Catheters, Medium, 12" extension tubing, 17 oz.

#???466 Ambu-Bag w/ Adult Mask, 1 ordered
--photo provided below; apparently Murray had this very important piece of equipment but did not care to use it as he used mouth-to-mouth resuscitation instead--an ambu-bag, oxygen or not, is a better method



#????66 Berman Airway 6, Single-Use Kit
--photo provided below; these are disposable airway kits, only 2 were ordered and apparently no such set was at the house on June 25th; commonsense should tell anyone that if you are thinking you need something like this for a regimen for sleep, then something is wrong



#309650 BD Syringes, 30CC, 40 syringes
--these are 30 mL syringes, no needles provided

#005667 Chester Ultrasound Gel, 5 Liters w/ 8 ounce bottle
--given Murray is a cardiologist, this gel would be used to do echocardiograms in the office; an echo tech may do the echo (this requires training) but a doctor needs to review the echo to determine if there is a problem or not

#103568 Cardiosens Electrodes Disposable Ultra II Tabs, 500 per box
--photo provided below; these are the pads that connect to wiring which connects to an EKG machine--something Murray obviously had at his disposal but failed to use to keep Michael alive (though again, if you are needing something like this to treat insomnia, something is wrong)



#009729 Starline Brand Gauze, 2" X 2"

Oddly enough, Murray claims in the LAPD interview that he kept those 3 bags found by Fleak regularly at the house, and in the closet per Michael's request. Though he had plenty of medications, used and unused--he apparently did not have spare condom catheters, spare IV tubing, more normal saline bags for rehydration, etc. I also wonder--where was some of the trash? Where are the syringes that were used to administer midazolam and lorazepam? Where is the old IV tubing, where are the old IV catheters, where were used needles? Why were only vials of medications kept by Murray? Did the LAPD examine any trash in the home, did Murray or others take any items as they left the house? What about the fireplace in the master bedroom--did Murray have access to this room and is there any evidence anything was burned in the fireplace?



Now, I missed this critical testimony myself but thanks to my "research family" I was able to get some information about these orders though it needs to be thoroughly reviewed when transcripts are made available to the public. Most videos on YouTube have cut a majority of critical testimony that was shown on TV. If you can add any information to the information below, please do.

Murray had apparently opened an account with Seacoast in 2006. He ordered some lidocaine through the company and he had possibly ordered pumps AND/OR IV pump tubing usually used with pumps in July 2007, October 5th 2007, June 24th 2008 and then attempted to request Safsite IV tubing March 25th but it was not in stock. He attempted to order it via the manufacturer but his credit card was denied.

This is the image of what I believe he attempted to order on March 25th (#105778 SAFESITE HORIZON PUMP IV SET 24/CASE, Manufacturer #SS3140 via B Braun Medical) , though there is a mismatching of the names of this product--I matched the manufacturer numbers to come up with this:



Possible Order Dates:
April 14th (3 pages)
May 12th--Exel IV sets purchased (notice this is after the May 10th recording though who knows what Murray really had collected overtime)
May 19th
June 1st (this order included the ambu-bag and 2 airway kits)
June 15th--talks with Connie Ng about urine catheter supplies, she attempted to order but not available (Connie Ng inquired with Seacoast for all purchases)
June 17th--follow-up conversation, but out of stock
June 22nd--invoice for catheters, small, shipped that day, leg bags not shipped (however a wrapper with medium sized catheters was found at the house and apparently some bag was used)
June 26th--at 9:26 a.m. PST Connie Ng cancelled back orders and asked for a refund

Seacoast would not allow items to be shipped to a house in California--items had to be shipped to the office in Las Vegas (this was attempted on April 13th only)

I realize there is some confusion regarding the condom catheters so if someone can add more information, please do.

QUESTIONS:

Had Murray ever actually ordered an IV pump or was it just IV tubing typically used in a pump? WHY? To the best of my knowledge a cardiologist does not need tubing or especially an IV pump in their office. Did he order any lidocaine while treating Michael? I never saw any on the invoices. He did order some medium-sized condom caths--when? I saw the order for small condom caths and medium bags as well--so out of this, what all did Murray get and not get and when?

Again, this blog will morph over time and/or be added to as time progresses as more information is obtained or understood so stay tuned.